Perdido 03

Perdido 03

Monday, January 14, 2013

Barack Obama And The Ruin Of Public Education

Bill Ayres writes a letter to Barack Obama:

The landscape of “educational reform” is currently littered with rubble and ruin and wreckage on all sides. Sadly, your administration has contributed significantly to the mounting catastrophe. You’re not alone: The toxic materials have been assembled as a bipartisan endeavor over many years, and the efforts of the last several administrations are now organized into a coherent push mobilized and led by a merry band of billionaires including Bill Gates, Michael Bloomberg, Sam Walton, and Eli Broad.

Whether inept or clueless or malevolent—who’s to say?—these titans have worked relentlessly to take up all the available space, preaching, persuading, promoting, and, when all else fails, spreading around massive amounts of cash to promote their particular brand of school change as common sense. You and Secretary Arne Duncan—endorsed in your efforts by Newt Gingrich, Paul Ryan, and a host of reactionary politicians and pundits—now bear a major responsibility for that agenda.

The three most trumpeted and simultaneously most destructive aspects of the united “school reform” agenda are these: turning over public assets and spaces to private management; dismantling and opposing any independent, collective voice of teachers; and reducing education to a single narrow metric that claims to recognize an educated person through a test score. While there’s absolutely no substantive proof that this approach improves schooling for children, it chugs along unfazed—fact-free, faith-based reform at its core, resting firmly on rank ideology rather than any evidence whatsoever.

The three pillars of this agenda are nested in a seductive but wholly inaccurate metaphor: Education is a commodity like any other—a car or a refrigerator, a box of bolts or a screwdriver—that is bought and sold in the marketplace. Within this controlling metaphor the schoolhouse is assumed to be a business run by a CEO, with teachers as workers and students as the raw material bumping along the assembly line while information is incrementally stuffed into their little up-turned heads.

It’s rather easy to begin to think that “downsizing” the least productive units, “outsourcing” and “privatizing” a space that was once public, is a natural event. Teaching toward a simple standardized measure and relentlessly applying state-administered (but privately developed and quite profitable) tests to determine the “outcomes” (winners and losers) becomes a rational proxy for learning; “zero tolerance” for student misbehavior turns out to be a stand-in for child development or justice; and a range of sanctions on students, teachers, and schools—but never on lawmakers, foundations, corporations, or high officials (they call it “accountability”)—is logical and level-headed.

...


When the aim of education and the sole measure of success is competitive, learning becomes exclusively selfish, and there is no obvious social motive to pursue it. People are turned against one another as every difference becomes a potential deficit. Getting ahead is the primary goal in such places, and mutual assistance, which can be so natural in other human affairs, is severely restricted or banned. It’s no wonder that cheating scandals are rampant in our country and fraudulent claims are commonplace.

Race to the Top is but one example of incentivizing bad behavior and backward ideas about education, as the Secretary of Education begins to look and act like a program officer for some charity rather than the leading educator for all children: It’s one state against another, this school against that one, and my second grade in fierce competition with the second grade across the hall.
You have opposed privatizing social security, pointing out the terrible risks the market would impose on seniors if the voucher plan were ever adopted. And yet you’ve supported—in effect—putting the most endangered young people at risk through a similar scheme. We need to expand, deepen, and fortify the public space, especially for the most vulnerable, not turn it over to private managers. The current gold rush of for-profit colleges gobbling up student loans is but one cautionary tale.

You’ve said that you defend working people and their right to organize and yet you have publicly and noisily maligned teachers and their unions on several occasions. You need to consider that good working conditions are good teaching conditions, and that good teaching conditions are good learning conditions. We can’t have the best learning conditions if teachers are forced away from the table, or if the teaching corps is reduced to a team of short-termers and school tourists.

You have declared your support for a deep and rich curriculum for all students regardless of circumstance or background, and yet your policies rely on a relentless regimen of standardized testing, and test scores as the sole measure of progress.

You should certainly pause and reconsider. What’s done is done, but you can demonstrate wisdom and true leadership if you pull back now and correct these dreadful mistakes.

In a vibrant democracy, whatever the most privileged parents want for their children must serve as a minimum standard for what we as a community want for all of our children. Arne Duncan attended the University of Chicago Laboratory Schools (as did our three sons); you sent your kids to Lab, and so did your friend Rahm Emanuel. There, students found small classes, abundant resources, and opportunities to experiment and explore, ask questions and pursue answers to the far limits, and a minimum of time-out for standardized testing. They found, as well, a respected and unionized teacher corps, people who were committed to a life-long career in teaching and who were encouraged to work cooperatively for their mutual benefit (and who never would settle for being judged, assessed, rewarded, or punished based on student test scores).

If it's good enough for you, good enough for the privileged, then it must be good enough for the kids in public schools everywhere—a standard to be aspired to and worked toward. Any other ideal for our schools, in the words of John Dewey who founded the school you chose for your daughters, “is narrow and unlovely; acted upon it destroys our democracy.”

An eloquent dissection of corporate education reform and Barack Obama's crucial role in promoting it.

When your evaluations change this week and suddenly you are subject to 40% VAM based upon student test scores, remember who is DIRECTLY responsible for that change - Barack Obama.

Last year during the State of the Union Address, he looked into the camera and said that teachers need to stop teaching to the test, that education was about more than testing.

You wouldn't know that from the Obama education policies.

They've expanded the role of testing from math and ELA to every subject in every grade.

They've gone from grading schools with test scores to grading individual teachers with test scores.

And they've expanded testing to every grade all the year through - all so that teacher "effectiveness" can be measured and rewarded, teacher "ineffectiveness" measured and punished.

Barack Obama bears a lot of responsibility for the ruin of public education.

Yes, No Child Left Behind was bad - but Race to the Top is turning out to be truly toxic.

No wonder Obama, Duncan, Emanuel and the rest of the neo-liberal Democratic hypocrites only practice these policies on Other People's Children.

3 comments:

  1. I agree that the current negative drumbeat is undermining public education. Critically needed financial resources are being redirected towards various alternative schooling options such as charter schools and vouchers for private schools. Communities hear so much negative that they are reluctant to stand with their public schools in times of need, for example rejecting local property tax initiatives that would help backfill for lost revenue. And the most damaging aspect of this relentless negative drumbeat is that it undermines school pride moral and confidence, thereby impacting the school culture.

    GO PUBLIC: A Day in the Life of an American School District was designed to give people an authentic look inside the world of public education. We had 50 directors and their crews follow 50 subjects on 28 campuses in one day, May 8, 2012. Pasadena is a racially and economically diverse community in Southern California. GO PUBLIC tells the story of one full day from sun up to long after sundown.

    Public education is a right available to everyone in our country and 90% of the nations’ children attend public school. We wanted to provide a window into the world of one urban school district, the many dedicated people, the myriad of opportunities available and the complexity of effectively serving the needs of all students.

    This project is important now because too much focus has been placed on what is supposedly broken in public education. There is always room for improvement, but we also wanted to capture the remarkable things that go on each and every day in our public schools, the teamwork it takes and the textured richness for those involved. By telling the stories of individuals that work and participate in the schools, we want to encourage viewers to become informed and compassionate advocates for their community public schools.

    Please check out and view a few of the short films (only 4 minutes each) located on our website at www.gopublicproject.org. Thank you and GO PUBLIC!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Follow up to the last post. The GO PUBLIC Documentary Project followed teachers, students, administrators, support staff and volunteers to try and give an overview of all the working parts in a district. Edutopia featured an informative article about the project at http://www.edutopia.org/blog/film-festival-public-school-district-documentary

    We are currently in post production on a feature documentary. We hope both the short films and the feature documentary film encourages audiences to once again champion their local public schools. www.gopublicproject.com

    ReplyDelete
  3. Not to mention the fact Obama and Duncan bypassed Congress with RTTT as a substitute for NCLB. Duncan should have been impeached for that.

    ReplyDelete